Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2423a71b82f5cd4

Jump to content

Talk:Atira asteroid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Elios Peredhel in topic 2025 SC79 is not a Vatira asteroid

Risk

[edit]

I'm going to be an ignorant blimp and ask:Can we experience an impact event by these stones?--CAN T 21:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

In theory, if one of the unknown Apoheles made a close approach to Venus, Venus could nudge the asteroid's orbit outwards making it an Earth-crossing asteroid. -- Kheider (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

[edit]

The claim that this is a Hawaiian word was added anonymously. It looks suspiciously like aphelion (< apo-helion). This is either a happy coincidence, or a hoax. Hopefully I'll be able to confirm / disconfirm soon - or does someone here know? kwami 05:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to David J. Tholen, it is really the hawaiian word for orbit : look here (better put a reference in the article). Duckysmokton 10:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. David just confirmed that account himself. kwami 18:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I put 'said to be the Hawaiian word for orbit' as I doubt an astronomical sense is the primary definition, even if used to translate English orbit in textbooks, and we don't know what that primary sense is. kwami 18:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Apohele?

[edit]

I have found no reliable website that describes "Apohele" asteroid class. But JPL NEO website names NEAs inside Earth's orbit as Atira asteroids. So, the article subject is Atira asteroids. — Chesnok (talkcontribs) 23:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppositions

[edit]

The article refers to "oppositions" . Objects whose orbits lie within the Earth's orbit can't have oppositions - only inferior and superior conjunctions. What does the text mean? -- Chris C (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Only 15 known objects (12 asteroids+Mercury+Venus+Sun) do not come to opposition. So in this case the term oppositions (Opps.) is probably loosely used to mean different epochs with maximum solar elongation since these objects seldom get more than 60 degrees from the Sun. -- Kheider (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

2025 SC79 is not a Vatira asteroid

[edit]

@Elios Peredhel: You have made changes to a few articles (Special:Diff/1317828994, Special:Diff/1317815603, Special:Diff/1317817518) stating that 2025 SC79 is an ꞌAylóꞌchaxnim or Vatira asteroid. This is not correct: 2025 SC79 has an aphelion of 0.719 au, which is outside of Venus's perihelion (0.718 au). I have reverted those edits. Renerpho (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I see. 2025 SC79 has an aphelion just 0.000498 AU outside Venus's. Elios Peredhel (talk) 09:48, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Close, but no cigar. Renerpho (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Elios Peredhel (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply