Talk:Athlinks

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mountain Biking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Triathlon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Triathlon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Triathlon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TriathlonWikipedia:WikiProject TriathlonTemplate:WikiProject TriathlonTriathlon

Athletics

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I feel that site merits inclusion based on this in wp:web:

The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.

* This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites,

I have a references that are featured on two newspaper's websites.. RockyMountainNews, and an AP National article that is on Foxnews.com website. The RockyMountainNews entry is from one of the writer's blogs..

I realize that the article falls a little short in doing nothing more than describing what it offers (and not what it achieved).. My argument is based on the references.

Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Athlinks

Untitled