Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a724c6ba0a68e

Jump to content

Talk:Asteroid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Otr500 in topic Article concerns and classification
Former good articleAsteroid was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 1, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 17, 2005Good article nomineeListed
June 23, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 17, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Spelling/vocabulary issue

[edit]

Article uses the word 'meter' - a measuring device - as a unit of length where the correct word is clearly 'metre'. 2604:3D09:D07E:130:F881:D1FD:9EE4:73EB (talk) 10:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

In United States English both words are usually spelt "meter". JBW (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

7794 Sanvito

[edit]

I would like to point out the presence of in the novel and film 2001: A Space Odyssey: 7794_Sanvito#In_fiction. --Alessandro Crisafulli (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article concerns and classification

[edit]
Unsourced paragraphs, like the fifth in the "Terminology" section, are problematic. Content after a source occurs more than once. It could be just misplaced references, but maybe not. Others, such as the first paragraph of the "Trojans" subsection, more than one paragraph in the "Size distribution" subsection, the third and fourth paragraph of the "Orbital classification" subsection, fail the B-class criteria #1, The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:40, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome to improve the article and find the necessary sources! Artem.G (talk) 08:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, while I dabble a little in astronomy, of the 2,608 editors and 595 watchers, I am probably far down the list in experience on the subject. I don't use a bot and manually and randomly perform maintenance. At a point, I will perform reviews, but cannot stop at every instance to redirect. I would never get anything done, and the reason for maintenance tags is to call attention to issues, and maybe someone will take an interest. However, that is not to say I do not appreciate an invitation for collaboration, so thank you, -- Otr500 (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply