Talk:Assault
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by BarrelProof in topic Ambiguity
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assault article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 9 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Ambiguity
[edit]"Assault is typically treated as a misdemeanor and not as a felony (unless it involves a law enforcement officer)."
Does it matter how the law enforcement officer was involved? That is to ask, is it a felony if the law enforcement officer is the accused?
--Crumbinator 00:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC
- The quote says it is about what is typical. Law enforcement officers are not typically the accused party. (I wonder why the above comment hasn't been archived.) — BarrelProof (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
"Drubber" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Drubber has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 9 § Drubber until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class law articles
- High-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles