Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24fa4a07c95224d

Jump to content

Talk:Ascalon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Tiamut in topic Removed

Sources for expansion

[edit]

Middle Bronze:

Late Bronze:

Iron Age:

Byzantine period:

Ottoman period:

  • עסקלאן אל‑ ג'דידה : השלטון המצרי וההתיישבות המצרית באזור אשקלון 1831 ‑ 1948 עורך/כים: אברהם ששון, רפאל י' לואיס ודניאל וורגה שם הספר: אשקלון : מרחב מחיה ומרחב לחימה : קובץ מחקרים על מישור החוף הדרומי ושפלת יהודה מקום ההוצאה: תל אביב שם ההוצאה: רסלינג שנת ההוצאה: 2022 עמוד: 255

Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removed

[edit]

"The absence of a port[dubious discuss] was recounted also by later scholars such as Izz al-Din ibn Shaddad (1217–1285) and Abulfeda (1273–1331). It was cited as one of the reason why Ascalon was one of the last coastal cities to stand against the Crusaders[dubious discuss].[1]" This paragraph followed a sentence about Khusraw that misrepresented his statements about the city. It is also out of place in the chronology. Abulfeda does say there is no harbor (he says so in Le Strange's work which I just added, if anyone wants a ref to readd it somewhere further on). Tiamut (talk) 07:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Sorry, I don't understand your entry.
First, I'm making my comments visible:
"The absence of a port{{dubious |Absence??!! Being a port city was its raison d'etre! |date= August 2024}} was recounted also by later scholars such as Izz al-Din ibn Shaddad (1217–1285) and Abulfeda (1273–1331). It was cited as one of the reason why Ascalon was one of the last coastal cities to stand against the Crusaders{{dubious |NO, being a port city allowed it to withstand Crusader attacks, as it could be resupplied from Egypt by sea. |date= August 2024}}.[1]"
  • We can't just remove whatever looks contradictory, if it's based on a RS (Sharon in this case). Is anything misquoted? If not: does any RS explain the mystery?
  • Abulfeda does say there is no harbor: again, what could he have meant? Maybe just that there's no proper, protective bay, which I do believe was always the case? Or that in his time the port facilities were absent (had been destroyed)?
This issue is highly relevant: Ascalon losing its mai purpose, that of a port city, at certain times in its history. The chronology is essential in this matter.

References

  1. 1 2 Sharon 1995, p. 65.

Arminden (talk) 10:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I removed it because it was in the wrong section (Fatimid). It can be readded as part of the events it is connected to. Port seems to have been destroyed when the city's fortifications were. Found two useful excerpts from Le Strange:

"Abul Fida in the fourteenth century writes : "'Askalan, in Filastin, is a town where there are ancient remains. It lies on the sea coast. Between it and Ghazzah the distance is about three leagues. It is one of the fortresses of Islam in Syria. Muhallabi says 'Askalan stands by the sea-shore on an elevation, and is one of the finest of the coast towns. It has no harbour. Its inhabitants drink well-water, which is sweet (not brackish). Between it and Ghazzah the distance is 10 miles, and between it and Ar Ramlah 18 miles. At the present day it is in ruins, and there are no inhabitants." (A. F., 231.)" (LeStrange, p. 402) ...  

Note also that Dimashqi writes in 1300: "South of this lay the Kingdom of Ghazzah (Gaza), the capital of which was anciently called Ghazzah Hashim. " It is a city so rich in trees as to be like a cloth of brocade spread out on the sand. To the Ghazzah Kingdom at times were counted 'Askalan, which belonged to the Franks, and which the Muslims took and destroyed; Ycifa (Jaffa), Kaisariyyah, Arsuf, Ad Darun, and Al 'Arish." (p. 42) Tiamut (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also to clarify, modified Khusraw in the edit to match the cited text. He said nothing about the harbor/port at all. Tiamut (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I see!
Very confusing. A Russian dolls-style quote. Where does the quoted text by Muhallabi start & end within Le Strange's quote from Abul Fida? :) I guess it's Muhallabi who calls it "one of the finest of the coast towns", while Abul Fida describes it in his own voice as "in ruins, and there are no inhabitants" - or not, since Abul Fida himself also writes that "It is one of the fortresses of Islam in Syria", in the present tense? One reason why we shouldn't use primary sources is that in the more remote past, even "scholars" often didn't manage to write in clear sentences. Arminden (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Notes.
Correct? Arminden (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Believe so yes. Think Muhallabi is not quoted, just paraphrased and it applies only to the sentence his name is in. Tiamut (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply