Talk:Artificial urinary sphincter
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability
[edit]I have my doubts about the notability of this device, based on the fact that it has been written up in BJU International only recently, and at that time, was still in the experimental phase, having only been tested on 36 subjects. I have requested input from the WikiProject Medicine community regarding the standards of notability generally in use among that project. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Issue resolved. Apparently, there are more than just one of these devices. The article has been rewritten to cover all models, not just the one. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Artificial urinary sphincter can also be used with penile implant
[edit]I have an aus and I'm looking for an implant 72.10.218.25 (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Edit request: company name in the Rigicon rows
[edit] | The user below has a request that an edit be made to Artificial urinary sphincter. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 877 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. |
Disclosure: I am an employee of Rigicon, Inc., the manufacturer named in the rows below. Because of this conflict of interest I am not editing the article myself and am asking an independent editor to review the following factual correction.
- Company name. In the ContiClassic and ContiReflex rows of the AUS model table, change "Rigicon Innovative Urological Solutions" to "Rigicon, Inc.", the company's legal name as shown in FDA correspondence.[1] Suggested citations for the two devices, which the rows currently lack:[2][3]
The other cells of these rows (2020; three components; pressure adjustable only for ContiReflex) are correct. I have not requested any change to other manufacturers' rows or to the article text. Thank you for considering this. Cybokron (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "K181673: RIGI 10 Malleable Penile Prosthesis" (PDF). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 15 April 2019.
- ↑ Koca, O.; et al. (2024). "Rigicon ContiClassic and ContiReflex artificial urinary sphincter devices". Translational Andrology and Urology. 13 (8): 1762–1766. doi:10.21037/tau-23-464. PMID 39280675.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ↑ Wilson, Steven K.; et al. (2024). "First safety outcomes for Rigicon ContiClassic artificial urinary sphincter". International Journal of Impotence Research. 36 (8): 829–832. doi:10.1038/s41443-023-00748-8. PMID 37543658.