Talk:Arthur Munby

The tendency of this article and non-verified assertions..

This article, from its inception and during its limited build, has concentrated entirely on a supposed aberrant sexuality of the subject. Munby had aspects of his life that were unorthodox and perhaps rich in eccentricity, however, like most people he is more than one-dimensional. The article shows no attempt to be balanced and has very little raw factual information on even names, dates, places etc.; it is a list of observations with no chronology.

I have added extra text about his time at the Working Men's College with in-line citation to actual hard source under a new Reference section. However, all other text in the article has no links to verifiable sources. There seems to be implication in the structure of the page that perhaps the non-verified text should be understood to relate to the list under a section headed 'Sources'. In-line citation needs to be added to all assertions in the page, and the cited sources put in References (reflist).

I have changed the name of the Sources section to 'Further reading', as that is all it appears to be.

Can someone improve and broaden this article to make it more balanced?

Acabashi (talk) 00:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)