Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24be71d6bcdcf4f

Jump to content

Talk:Armstrong cases

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge

Tone down

[edit]

Please tone down the bold face. Cheers. V. Joe 11:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Joe -- most of the current bold face is from the style sheet, and I'm hoping it won't be so glaring once some more text is added. TheronJ 12:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Correct name of case?

[edit]

I think this article may be ambiguously named. The article refers to the appellate decision, 232 Cal. App. 3d 1060 , but this decision actually only used Armstrong's last name. However, I discovered that the lower court decision from August 10, 1984, in the Los Angeles Superior Court include Armstrong's full name in the case name: Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong, case number C 420153. See Ford v. Superior Court, 188 Cal. App. 3d 737, 740 (Cal.App. 1986). Perhaps the ambiguity is too unimportant to justify changing the title of the article. Just wanted to point it out. Taiwan prepares (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge

[edit]

I don't see that Gerry Armstrong has notability outside of this court case. I propose that the material in Gerry Armstrong (activist) be merged here with redirect to follow. Any objections? -Location (talk) 23:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Ongoing opposition up to at least 2015 suggest a notability beyond just those court cases. The 2008 maisonneuve article also supports this claim for ongoing opposition. Klbrain (talk) 21:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply