Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225d57cdb16bde9

Jump to content

Talk:Armiger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Tamfang in topic RKBA

RKBA

[edit]
The possession of such an achievement once entitled the right to use swords and, later, rifles; hence the verb to bear arms carries both possible meanings.

When and where has there been such a legal link?

In feudal times the armigers were roughly those wealthy enough to supply their own equipment for war; later, there was a Prussian saying that das Portepee adelt (the sword-knot ennobles), meaning that to become an officer (whose uniform included a porte-épée) was to join the gentry. But these points are not equivalent to the claim made.

One thing that comes to mind is language of the English Bill of Rights 1689, promising (to Protestants of good character) the right to possess arms befitting their station, whatever that means. (Paraphrased from fallible memory.) —Tamfang (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply