Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a8960fa9d14e12

Jump to content

Talk:Arizona State Route 92/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Starstriker7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 (talk · contribs) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

i'll do this review. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Criterion 1

[edit]
  • In previous versions of the article, the county in which the SR is located was present in the lead. Is there any worth in re-adding it?
  • "which contains the Huachuca Mountains" - "Contains" sounds awkward. Can this be re-worded?
  • Wikilink "Palominas".
  • "Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), who is responsible for" - Substitute "who" for "which".
  • "originating at SR 82 in Whetstone, heading south into Sierra Vista" - Replace the comma with "and" or "before".
  • "turned south following its current route to Bisbee. - There is an extra space between The period and the refs.

Criterion 2

[edit]
  • There is a cite needed tag in the History section.

Criterion 3

[edit]

The article seems sufficiently broad and focused, with relation to to peer GAs.

Criterion 4

[edit]

The article is written without undue weight or neutrality issues.

Criterion 5

[edit]

Edit history is all quiet.

Criterion 6

[edit]

Images check out. No captions are needed.

Overall comments

[edit]

Good work on this; I will pass it after the few nitpicks are resolved. Also, I believe I reviewed an article on the Jinke Road Metro Station, which you submitted at GAN a while back; if you'd like to fix the comments raised and resubmit the article, I think it might pass as well. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think I addressed all the issues mentioned. Are there any more?  PCB 05:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nope, you are all set. Passing it now. --Starstriker7(Talk) 07:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply