Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26696da1a901528

Jump to content

Talk:Archbishop of Armagh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by AnandaBliss in topic Significance of early vs. later?

During the Reformation

[edit]

Rather than duplicating references, I suggest having a section with the above title, covering Cromer to Dowdall. The Church of Ireland and Roman Catholic lists could start with Loftus and O'Tighe respectively. This is what is done in some other episcopal pages - I think that it works better. Alekksandr (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done as suggested. Scrivener-uki (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archbishop of Armagh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Categorisation

[edit]

Category:Archbishops of Armagh currently contains a number of men who were abbots/bishops of Armagh before the See was made an archbishopric in the time of Cellach of Armagh in the early 12th century. St Patrick is not one of them. I suggest that the following should *not* be categorised as Archbishops of Armagh, and that the category 'Bishops of Armagh' should be created to contain them: -

  1. Ailill the First
  2. Ailill the Second
  3. Benignus of Armagh
  4. Carláen
  5. Fiachra mac Colmain
  6. Congus
  7. Cormac of Armagh - his article says that he was ' Archbishop of Armagh diocese' - I suggest that this should be 'Bishop'
  8. Dubthach the First
  9. Dubthach the Second
  10. Fedelmid Find
  11. Fland Feblae mac Scandláin
  12. Iarlaithe mac Treno
  13. Mac Laisre
  14. Eochu macDiarmaid
  15. Nuadu of Loch Uama - his article says that he was ' Archbishop of Armagh diocese' - I suggest that this should be 'Bishop'
  16. Ségéne
  17. Senach
  18. Saint Suibne
  19. Tómméne
  20. Áed Ua Forréid

Thoughts? Alekksandr (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Now done. Alekksandr (talk) 21:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bold

[edit]

Although it's technically correct, I find that the excessive use of bold is exhausting to read. Is all. MinorProphet (talk) 05:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Significance of early vs. later?

[edit]

The early and later abbots & bishops distinction has existed since the the article was created. Is there a reason for this distinction? If not, perhaps it's better to combine the two tables. AnandaBliss (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply