Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ed097da0decd4

Jump to content

Talk:Arc de Triomphe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attendance at opening

[edit]

"Upon its completion, the Arc de Triomphe was so far from the center of town almost no one showed up for the opening ceremony. " Since the Champs-Elysées was already lined with grand 18th century private houses, I removed this assertion here. Woman 01:50, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The above comment was part of the article - I moved it to the talk page. Rhobite 15:26, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2021

[edit]

The measurements must be wrong as a meter is larger than a foot. How can it be more meters than it is feet? 2603:8081:7001:1F8:B4A8:C604:2B13:301B (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. It looks like the measurements are fine. 50 metres (164 ft), width of 45 m (148 ft) and depth of 22 m (72 ft), while its large vault is 29.19 m (95.8 ft) high and 14.62 m (48.0 ft) wide. The smaller transverse vaults are 18.68 m (61.3 ft) high and 8.44 m (27.7 ft) wide. Height 50 m (164 ft) Wide: 45 m (148 ft) Deep: 22 m (72 ft) ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

While we’re at it, how can a 60 meter arch height possibly be considered only “slightly” higher than 50 meters of height? An increase of 20% deserves at least a “moderately” or “somewhat“ yes? Article is locked so leaving comment instead, FWIW, regarding the section discussing other arches.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.168.144.28 (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tallest arch

[edit]

Article mentions La Grande Arche in La Défense as the tallest arch in the world? The Gateway Arch in St. Louis is on the line and would like a word… 113.252.231.146 (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

192>110, but this article is locked and seems to have been abandoned. 2604:6000:CFC0:43:B531:97C1:2238:E859 (talk) 05:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2024

[edit]

Please change

that used its design as a model include Arch of Triumph in Pyongyang, North Korea; Arcul de Triumf in Bucharest, Romania; Rosedale World War I Memorial Arch in Kansas City, Kansas, US; and a miniature version at the Paris Casino in Las Vegas, US.[33]

to

that used its design as a model include Arch of Triumph in Pyongyang, North Korea; Arcul de Triumf in Bucharest, Romania; Rosedale World War I Memorial Arch in Kansas City, Kansas, US; a miniature version at the Paris Casino in Las Vegas, US [33]; and the Washington Arch in Washington Square Park in New York City, US. ==

75.127.202.130 (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

What is the history of the scupltural group that can be seen on top of the monument?

[edit]

And why was it removed? Countercheck (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

It is Commons:Category:The Triumph of the Revolution by Alexandre Falguière. Apparently it deteriorated within four years. The article lacks this information. Tbhotch (CC BY-SA 4.0) 23:33, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank yoiu Countercheck (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply