Talk:Applicability domain
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Applicability Domain → Applicability domain –
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Sources do not generally use uppercase here (see this search). Dohn joe (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support – We should avoid unnecessary uppercase formatting for generic terms. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support, per all above. This was originally moved the other direction five years ago, which may have been before clear guidelines for titles had been established. —Torchiest talkedits 21:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.