Talk:Apple T2

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tons of speculative / ambiguous language

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An example of this is how it says "T2 was integrated into M1 eliminating the need for a separate chip". There's no confirmation the implementation from T2 was integrated. T2 is it's own separate chip with specific tasks that even Intel chips had.

It wasn't that it wasn't needed anymore, it was that the CPU before and after the transition had these features and T2 served as a security co-processor that was replaced by features in the CPU that aren't necessarily directly derived from T2. TotallyNotSkyNet (talk) 04:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Apple T2

Tons of speculative / ambiguous language