Talk:Apiole

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Pharmacology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Abortion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Un-cited health claims

I propose deleting "In 1855, Joret and Homolle discovered that apiol was an effective treatment of amenorrea or lack of menstruation." unless a proper citation can be provided. This is a specious medical claim.

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of the discussion was Not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Should this article be merged with Apiol? Much of the info in Apiol is also contained in this article. TheLeaper (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oppose: the contents now seem to be sufficiently differentiated between the chemical compound apiol and the traditional herbal preparation Apiole, which will contain many compounds other than apiol. Klbrain (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Apiole

Un-cited health claims

Merger proposal