Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229e8c5cc4607d6

Jump to content

Talk:Apigenin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Xobbitua in topic Potential references

anti-aromatase

[edit]

It is also claimed to be a potent anti-aromatase, which prevents the conversion of testosterone into estrogen. Can someone find/add info with citations on this?

More dietary sources

[edit]

http://www.chron.com/news/health/article/Vegetables-with-apigenin-are-key-cancer-fighters-4738722.php

Apigenin: "In addition to parsley, celery and artichokes, you'll find it in apples, cherries, grapes, chamomile tea and wine, and in herbs such as tarragon, cilantro, licorice, spearmint, basil and oregano".

Please, try to find out how MUCH apigenin these contain. Do you get optimal amount from wine and apples, for example? Can you get too much?

ee1518 (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Potential references

[edit]


Thank you (you forgot your signature) for your opinion and suggestion.

These reviews are meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject. The reviews are placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).

The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”

The reviews in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, they are scholarly and peer-reviewed, and they are published in academic journals. Granateple (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

How about adding a fresher review, e.g. Induction of Cancer Cell Death by Apigenin: A Review on Different Cell Death Pathways | Bentham Science "It lists a few confirmed ways Apigenin kills the cancer cells, stating "However, the frequency of each cell death pathway may be influenced by the cell type." Xobbitua (talk) 09:15, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article error?

[edit]

The last two structures in the synthesis path look the same to me. Keith Henson (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Chamomile

[edit]

"dried chamomile flower about 3–5 mg/gram" seems wrong to me, I've removed it. The cited source - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791748 - ultimately references https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400525/Data/Flav/Flav_R03.pdf for the numbers, which doesn't contain any data on chamomile. Other articles like https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25598797/ quote very different and much wider ranges like 40-740mg/100g. Ivanktw (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply