Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21db1e80970f557

Jump to content

Talk:Apache

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 days ago by Arctic Circle System in topic Categorization of Southern Athabaskan/Apachean peoples

Genocide

[edit]

It is a fact that the Apache are the sufferers of ethnic cleansing and genocide. I know its not pretty but its true. This fact needs to be allowed to remain a centerpiece of the page, especially when speaking about their relations with the europeans. Thusly, it would be nice if people would refrain from removing this information, as said act is offensive and erasure of history. The erasure of history is key to continued genocide so you may choose to support it via continued historical erasure or not. But know that if you do, you are choosing to support cleansing of history in favor of white supremacy, something wikipedia does not stand for. Thank you. Inependantyo (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Provide verifiable and reliable sources and at least try to write without mangling existing language and sourced information in the article.olderwiser 13:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tribes in Mexico?

[edit]

How does the article begin by saying that the Apache remain in the U.S. and modern Mexico, and then afterwards list only U.S. tribes, as if the only tribes that exist are in the U.S., and not in Mexico?Jimhoward72 (talk) 00:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

It's not appropriate to link to external pages directly in the text of the article like in the ethnobotany sections. Should we make a separate section for Ethnobotany on this page? Luiysia (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2021

[edit]

The apache was a modern tribe in the 2000's. 69.147.54.110 (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2021

[edit]

I would like to add the following to the "Regions with Significant population" section:

Canada: 825 Residents of Canada identified as having Apache Ancestry in the 2016 Canadian Census.

This information is taken from the following source: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/abpopprof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=PR&Code1=01&Data=Count&SearchText=Canada&SearchType=Begins&B1=All&C1=All&SEX_ID=1&AGE_ID=1&RESGEO_ID=1 GltKin21 (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Closing as I see that you've done it yourself. --Hemantha (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2023

[edit]

The Chiricahua ethnobotany subheading is placed immediately after a description of their kinship system, before the subheading on Jicarilla kinship. Maybe this should be moved further down to the space between "Undomesticated plants and other food sources" and "Crop cultivation", where another subheading on ethnobotany exists? Raccoon Enthusiast (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Done OP has since become autoconfirmed and implemented the edit themselves. Ovinus (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fought for centuries against the Spanish [and Mexican?] ppl?

[edit]

How have they fought the Spanish and Mexicans, if the Mexican community is an effect of the Spanish inquicition? Or are they native too? 2001:1C01:2238:B400:FCCE:B0BE:96F1:7E0D (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mexico was ruled by Spain, and then it gained its independence. The Apache fought first the Spanish and then, after Mexican independence, the soldiers of the subsequent government.2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:94BA:53E6:DE82:BF55 (talk) 02:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apache-Comanche wars

[edit]

See the Wikipedia article on the Comanche for some discussion of the conflicts between the Apache and the Comanche. More should be made of it in this article. There is also a long video on this and related material: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSYN7GF_ll0 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:94BA:53E6:DE82:BF55 (talk) 02:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move of Apache Indian

[edit]

An editor has requested that Apache Indian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) be moved to another page, which may be of interest to editors of this topic. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 05:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Canneci Tinné Apache Tribe

[edit]

Content was added about this organization that self-identifies as Native American tribes, Canneci Tinné Apache Tribe who incorporated in 2022; however, the group can't be used to cite itself and would require secondary, published material to demonstrate its connection to Apache people. The spelling Gocłic Łit'xuné can only be found on the organization's own website. Yuchitown (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Arrival in South West

[edit]

The timeframe that Apaches arrived in the southwest 500-1000 years ago is a best guess based largely on carbon dating found tools, which is incomplete and notoriously difficult in desert environments. It also is in conflict with oral history, which proposes a much longer time frame. The article should be changed to reflect these nuances and remove the objective framing of the 500-1000 timeframe, which is only a most supported explanation, but not a proven explanation.

This would also bring it better in line with related articles on Athabaskan peoples, which currently portray this nuance. 2603:8080:A300:4CAF:ECF5:583A:7BBC:73C2 (talk) 04:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

ToC

[edit]

This article needs a table of contents. 136.36.176.51 (talk) 02:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Назва Апачі

[edit]

Усе простіше. Назва племен «Апачі» походить від імені язичницького божества «Ah Puch». Ці інфо відповідає сутності мффології Майя (Mayan Mythology) 176.38.7.115 (talk) 09:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Categorization of Southern Athabaskan/Apachean peoples

[edit]

I'm currently looking over the categorization of the Navajo and Apache peoples within Category:Athabaskan peoples and it sticks out to me that the six main Apache groups, Jicarilla, Lipan, Mescalero, Chiricahua, Plains, and Western Apache are categorized separately from the Navajo. While on first glance it makes sense given that these groups are all called Apache while the Navajo aren't, given that the Navajo language more closely related to Western and Mescalero–Chiricahua Apache than any of the three are to Jicarilla, Lipan, and Plains, I am not convinced there is sufficient evidence for such a bipartite split between the Apache and the Navajo, rather than a seven-way split between the Navajo, Plains Apache, Western Apache, Jicarilla, Lipan, Mescalero, and Chiricahua. Am I missing something here, or should I move the categories around accordingly? Arctic Circle System (talk) 02:45, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think it is also perhaps worth noting that the original Spanish exonym for the Navajo was "Apaches de Navajó", referring to the Navajo as Apaches as well. 02:48, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Arctic Circle System (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply