Talk:Aon plc

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2014 2016 2017 2021 2022

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Update to Aon descriptor in article

Hi there, I've adjusted the description of Aon as a "global professional services firm" in the article description and provided a source. If anyone has any further concerns, please feel free to contact me here or on my Talk page. Thank you Jane for Gregory C. Case (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

9/11

I don't see any reference to their employees killed on 9/11. Bearian (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 17 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

---

Aon (company) → Aon plc – WP:CONCISE "plc" is enough to distinguish it from other articles and no other companies with the name, "Aon," have their own articles. ^Wiinter_U 07:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). C F A 21:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

• This is is standard disambiguation rather than using legal suffixes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Actually both methods are acceptable per WP:NCCORP#Disambiguation, but I would agree that it should go through a full discussion to change the title from the "(company)" parenthetical disambiguation to the legal suffix. In similar previous RM discussions I have seen, it has frequently depended on whether the legal suffix is included in its WP:COMMONAME used by most reliable sources, and using "(company)" is instead generally preferred when reliable sources rarely use the legal suffix. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose. The current disambiguator is far more common and the legal suffix is not part of the company's common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
• Comment I am going to agree with Zzyzx11. Both pratices have merit on Wikipedia, an example would be Apple Inc. The discussion should be whether plc is WP:COMMONAME enough to be included for WP:NATURALDIS. Edit: however, I agree with Necrothesp as it does not seem to be part of the common name. cookie monster 755 10:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

COI Disclosure

I work for a smaller division of Aon. I don't see how to add a COI disclosure template to this page. Thanks for any guidance. Slaatp25 (talk) 22:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 28 June 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

---

Aon (company) → Aon plc – Natural disambiguation using the legal name of Aon plc. Compare Shell plc, GSK plc, Anglo American plc. Conifer (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support Surely the legal name of the company over-rides a "what we do on Wikipedia" argument. The "plc" is actually a useful element of the name, as it is a reminder that it is now based in the UK, as opposed to the previous "Aon Corp".ThoughtIdRetired _TIR 08:09, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.