Talk:Anti-scratch coating
Add topic | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Material, AR?
[edit]What material is used for anti-scratch coating? Is it also used as an anti-reflective coating? —Ben FrantzDale 14:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Danger for PMMA
[edit]You write, that common glass cleaner can be used. But for Acrylic, common glass cleaner are deadly. The Acrylic will crack in a short of time. Acrylic is really sensitiv to Ammonium - based cleaner and most of all soap/water based cleaning products. Please make a annotation.
A aircraft cannopy can cost 3000 EUR. It would be verry bad that one will clean the coated cannopy with wrong products, because "I know from Wikipedia.." --81.13.237.223 (talk) 15:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Long on hype short on facts
[edit]This article does not bring any scientific evidence forward. It only repeats the claims made in eyewear ads which may well be false. Not really helpful at all. I would rather wikipedia did not have an entry than to have one like this one. N0w8st8s (talk) 09:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)n0w8st8s
Uhm....are those actually safer in any way? 188.117.129.226 (talk) 10:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Filters vs. fillers
[edit]The article mentions both and it's unclear they're not being confused. It's also weird to link to "Nanomaterials" like this: filters. -- Beland (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2025 (UTC)