Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a278ec6ffc48284b

Jump to content

Talk:Anti-authoritarianism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Grnrchst in topic Erroneous citation?


Erroneous citation?

[edit]

I tried to find the categorization of "low-scorers" in the original 1950 Adorno book (available here https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.469826) but could not find it. The 1991 Meloen publication seem to be the origin of that categorization of low-scores but quotes the 1950 book as a source. Not sure what to do of that. Maybe it comes from an additional analysis by Meloen of the Adorno results?

Iv (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Iv: Thanks for looking into this! I think there may either be an issue with the OCR of that copy or a change in the edition. With a bit of digging, I was able to find the specific chapter that Meloen was referencing: in "Chapter XIX: Types and Syndromes" Adorno covers in sequence "rigid low scorers", "protesting low scorers", "impulsive low scorers", "easy-going low scorers" and the "genuine liberal". So these were categories coined by Adorno himself, not invented by Meloen. Although it does appear "six" was a mistake, there were actually five categories. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Iv: Checked another copy of the book, and indeed it appears that copy of it you linked is incomplete; it only includes Parts 1-3 and leaves out parts 4 and 5 (which include the chapter I mentioned). Grnrchst (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


VfD results

[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. For details, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Anti-authoritarian. -- BD2412 talk 04:50, August 16, 2005 (UTC)