Talk:Anthroposophy/FAQ
Below are answers to frequently asked questions about the corresponding page Anthroposophy. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please update this material when needed. |
The main points of this FAQ (Talk:Anthroposophy#FAQ) can be summarized as:
- Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy requires that minority views not be given undue emphasis.
More detail is given on this point, below.
To view the response to a question, click the [show] link to the right of the question.
You should understand that, by its very nature, Wikipedia offers absolutely no remedy against citing mainstream scholarly works. Clearly expressed at by a Waldorf teacher that The article references peer-reviewed, largely academic sources, the opposite of propaganda.
Wikipedia is wholly sold out to experts: experts in debunking pseudoscience, experts in epistemology, experts in religion studies, experts in theology, experts in history, experts in medical science.
Please mind the following:Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources say about topics. You have not provided any sources at all, and seem to suggest that your edits are based on your personal knowledge; this is insufficient as we cannot verify your personal knowledge. Information must be published somewhere that readers can locate and verify the information.
— User:331dot
- Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 63#Need some help on Anthroposophy and its related articles, particularly Waldorf education, Anthroposophic medicine, and Biodynamic agriculture
- Talk:Anthroposophy/Archive 8#Epistemology, Ontology etc
- Talk:Anthroposophy/Archive 9#List of many
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner/Archive 4#Too many citations for any given sentence
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner/Archive 4#A scientist
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner/Archive 4#"Largely"?
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner/Archive 4#Edit warring against WP:PSCI
- Talk:Rudolf_Steiner/Archive 4#Neutrality tag
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner/Archive 4#Note Deluge