Talk:Another Tricky Day
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
![WikiProject icon](/everything/wiki/File:WikiProject_Songs_7"_record_on_sheet_music.png){kind=small}
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Another Tricky Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219112406/http://www.thewho.net/linernotes/FaceDances.htm to http://www.thewho.net/linernotes/FaceDances.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Single template confusion
[edit]The text of the article at present indicates that Another Tricky Day was not released as a single. The article concerns the song, one of many on Face Dances. There is an infobox, however, which labels the subject of this article as a single. Is it easy to resolve this contradictory appearance by changing the infobox, or would that break something? Alternatively, if we should say the song was released as a single at some point (and not merely made available on a track basis to music streaming/library services / as a promotional video), it would be better for someone to provide a source and change the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:193:8200:1670:5062:9F49:C5CF:E1A7 (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)