Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2514c39095ec60e

Jump to content

Talk:Another Stakeout

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by 64.180.169.55

This article had quite a bit of defacement on it that was unfortunately marked as "citation needed" rather than being removed. For example, it said that Joel Siegel named it the "Most Important movie of the 1990s!" and that it was a "cult film" with a tattooed fan club known as "Stalkies". LOL.

In any event, a simple Google search indicates that there is a group of troublemakers on the Internet going around editing film sites or discussion boards trying to fraudulently make it seem as though the film has cult status. Take a look at the blog post http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2008/04/lets_make_another_stakeout_a_c.php

It states: "Come join us and help us turn this movie into a giant cult hit for absolutely no good reason. Register and vote 10/10 for the movie. Get into heated trivia arguments about the movie. Quote lines, question other Stakeout heads' commitment to the movie. Let's forward this e-mail and flood the site to the point where there are Another Stakeout festivals and conventions and midnight showings with people in costume saying lines along with the movie ala Rocky Horror Pic Show. And remember, we are Another Stakeout fans. Not Stakeout fans. The first one was pretty good but like the Godfather 2 (or is the Godfather 2 like Another Stakeout?) director John Badham got it right the second time around. AS 2 forever!!".

I doubt anyone will ever read this page, but I put this here in case some sucker comes along and tries to revert it.

64.180.169.55 (talk) 03:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply