Talk:Anjana Chaudhari

Notability

Here is no reference , no notability , not an important person plz prove notability and give reference. --Jayanta Nath (talk) 05:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.2.178 (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

chitrodipura

chitrodipura

near mehsana 8 km

sagbai mataji nu mandir famous

sivji mandir kashi vishvanath akhado —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.223.152 (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear Sikh History or advanced user/editor,

I want to make a change to the part that says "anjana chaudhari is a backward class", the reference that they provide is a private book from a private author. My source is the official "National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 (Act No. 27 of 1993) (Database Searching)" of INDIA. THIS and i repeat ONLY THIS is the source which is true and legitimate. According to this source there is no such listing in the Gujarat section for "Anjana, Chaudhari, Chaudhary, Patidar, Patel, etc". The link for this page is " http://ncbc.nic.in/backward-classes/gujarat.pdf ". The main website is " http://ncbc.nic.in/ ", which is a GOVERNMENT OF INDIA website. I simply want to remove that link which states Anjana Chaudhari is a Other Backward Caste because it is simply false (I have the official source to prove it).

Now i ask you, how may i go about doing this? Because every-time i try to make a edit and change to the page it somehow gets reverted even though the changes are cited and explained!

This is a bit frustrating at this point. I have been at this for months now...

--Rjp2490 (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, on Wikipedia our primrary concern is WP:Verifiability. The source that cites Anjana Chaudhri appears verifiable. Infact, books are considered better sources than websites. What you could state is, Anjana Chaudhuri is considered OBC by some sources and not by other sources. What you cannot do it delete a WP:Verifiable source completly. On a side note this article needs a total revamp. It is very poorly written, and the other sources are poor. Thanks--SH 18:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

BUT THIS IS NOT JUST ANY WEBSITE. IT IS A GOVERNMENT WEBSITE. THE TOPIC DISCUSSED "OTHER BACKWARD CASTES" IS MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT NOT ANY ORDINARY AUTHOR OF A BOOK!

--Rjp2490 (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)--Rjp2490 (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Please note the following points:

1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. See WP:Manual of Style
2. See the section of referencing under WP:Verifiability.
3. Do not use capatilisation when communicating as that implies you are shouting.
4. Do not add talk about this page on my page.

Thanks--SH 10:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

ANJANA CHAUDHARI

Why do you keep deleting and undoing the proper changes? You have no idea what your doing and the claims your making. Who are you to correct me? I have plenty of references i can prove my point with. Don't touch the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjp2490 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Rjp2490, and welcome to Wikipedia. I tested out the link you provided as a source and there is nothing there; it's 404. Try it yourself and see. http://books.google.com/booksid=IWrTs5yt1DkC&lpg=PA1099&dq=anjana%20patidar%20kshatriya&pg=PA1099#v=onepage&q=anjana%20patidar%20kshatriya&f=false You must have copied the URL incorrectly somehow, as this link does not work. Please do not try to prohibit people from editing Wikipedia pages; Sikh History is within his rights to edit this or any other Wikipedia page. By the way, have you ever edited Wikipedia under any other user names? Thank you. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 05:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Infact the editor has used WP:Synthesis this time around, and seems to have spammed the article with the same link. Thanks --SH 16:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm new to wikipedia, my apologizes. And i'm not sure if this is the way im supposed to leave a message either. But, i want to say that even according to the wiki article for Anjana Chaudhari, "Another way of writing this classes' name are Chaudrari of Hindu Anjana, Chaudhari or Hindu Aanjana, Chaudhari or Aanjana, Aanjana Patel, Aanjana Patidar, Aanjana Desai, Aanjana Kanbi, Chaudhari Patel, Chaudhari Patidar". Therefore, my cited source was correct as it referred to "Anjana Patel" which is a term interchangeable with "Anjana Chaudhari". Is it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjp2490 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Anjana Chaudhari

Dear User SikhHistory,

You undid my last edit when i correctly cited a valid source.

I'm new to wikipedia, my apologizes. And i'm not sure if this is the way im supposed to leave a message either. But, i want to say that even according to the wiki article for Anjana Chaudhari, "Another way of writing this classes' name are Chaudrari of Hindu Anjana, Chaudhari or Hindu Aanjana, Chaudhari or Aanjana, Aanjana Patel, Aanjana Patidar, Aanjana Desai, Aanjana Kanbi, Chaudhari Patel, Chaudhari Patidar". Therefore, my cited source was correct as it referred to "Anjana Patel" which is a term interchangeable with "Anjana Chaudhari". Is it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjp2490 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello SikhHistory, Why must you undo changes when all changes are explained and also cited? There is no major change in my last edit other than removeing "other backward caste". This change is cited and explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjp2490 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.111.235 (talk)

Latest Anjana Chaudhari edit !

Dear Sikh History or advanced user/editor,

I want to make a change to the part that says "anjana chaudhari is a backward class", the reference that they provide is a private book from a private author. My source is the official "National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 (Act No. 27 of 1993) (Database Searching)" of INDIA. THIS and i repeat ONLY THIS is the source which is true and legitimate. According to this source there is no such listing in the Gujarat section for "Anjana, Chaudhari, Chaudhary, Patidar, Patel, etc". The link for this page is " http://ncbc.nic.in/backward-classes/gujarat.pdf ". The main website is " http://ncbc.nic.in/ ", which is a GOVERNMENT OF INDIA website. I simply want to remove that link which states Anjana Chaudhari is a Other Backward Caste because it is simply false (I have the official source to prove it).

Now i ask you, how may i go about doing this? Because every-time i try to make a edit and change to the page it somehow gets reverted even though the changes are cited and explained!

This is a bit frustrating at this point. I have been at this for months now...

THE ABOVE IS THE MESSAGE I POSTED FOR YOU TO SEE IN THE DISCUSSION PAGE OF THE "ANJANA CHAUDHARI" WIKI PAGE.

PLEASE REPLY TO IT AND HELP ME MAKE THE CHANGES THE CORRECT WAY.

THANK YOU

--Rjp2490 (talk) 08:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

References

Can you please look at the change i made to Anjana Chaudhari Page. Does it NOW look correct??? Please give me a reply on my User:Rjp2490 page.

--Rjp2490 (talk) 02:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2021

Anjana Chaudhari is a Hindu Kurmi caste found in Gujarat and nighbouring states.source:cencus of india 1921 volume 8 bombay presidency Part 1 page 184. 114.31.172.135 (talk) 10:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Morneo06 (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Anjana Chaudhari

This is Hindu Kurmi(kanabi)Caste Refer census of india 1921 volume 8 part 1 page 180 to 185. Also refer census of india 1931 where first time chaudhari appeared instead of kanabi.......in 1931 census full detail given about anjana kanabi....... In 1931 census kadva and leva kanabi wrote patidar while anjana kanbi wrote chaudhari....... There are many books where anjana refered as kanabi like mahajati patidar by devendra patel;kanbi kshatriya patidaro ka itihas by mangubhai patel and many more....... There are many gazzetes by bombay government in british period where clearly told about anjana kanbi.....so show truth not falseness........... Akakakalal (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Playing with history

For God sake stop playing with history and at least don't misrepresent the facts, around 3 lakh Muslims were killed in Jammu and you are trying to eye wash major war crimes of dogra crime. Aadam Bezaar (talk) 17:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2022

Anjana Chaudhary are not Jat, so kindly update it. Anjana Chaudhary are "Kulbi Chaudhary" and "Kulbi Patel" but not jat. 117.228.77.79 (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2024

Anjana Chaudhari is NOT an ST caste. Anjana Chaudhari are classified as OBC in Gujarat. Wrong information in this page about Anjana Chaudhari. This is an insult to the Anjana Chaudhari caste. Wikipedia must correct this information as soon as possible. Surta (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 17:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

anjana chaudharies are jats

they are jats. this is proven by dna results. and their gotras are similar. their physical features are similar and anjana chaudharies are said to be migrated from north 45.120.121.66 (talk) 11:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

thanks, anjana is jat. 2405:205:128E:3A40:0:0:5E1:28AC (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Then bring some citation as proof that they are Jats. When did they migrate here and are they different than those "Jath" (cameleer) people in Kutch? What gotras overlap? 2601:84:8501:8150:1177:CE:CEF9:391C (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

in niansi ri khyat there are three types of jats mentioned one of them is anjana. and anjanas are said to be migrated from Rajasthan many generations ago.

many gotras overlap such as kag/kang,paun/puniya,fak/phok/phor/phogat,akodiya,mahiyal,kathrotiya/katariya,uppal/uplana

also there is anjana division amog jats of jaipur region,and they have similar gotras to anjanas of north gj and marwad.

also dna samples support that anjanas are indeed jat as both castes score have high steppe admixture. and on genetic distance anjanas seem closer to haryanvi jats then any gujrati caste.

so it proves anjanas were separated from jats ~2026-11461-57 (talk) 07:18, 21 February 2026 (UTC)