Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251a40c2d5b2e5c

Jump to content

Talk:Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Dudley Miles in topic Sfn
Featured articleAnglo-Saxon Chronicle is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 1, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

WP:URFA/2020

[edit]

"Surviving manuscripts" is unsourced, including the map File:ASC.svg. A455bcd9 (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Now cited. I had to make one change, and there's one slight vagueness I should point out. I dropped the mention of Mercian dialect from the description of the Parker Chronicle; Swanton doesn't mention it, at least in the passage I'm citing, and looking in other sources it's not clear that the Mercian elements continue to 1070 anyway. The vagueness is that Swanton doesn't really cite that the Easter Table Chronicle is given the letter [I] because of the Rolls edition's A through F letters; he only says this for G and H. I think this is obvious enough that it doesn't need to be cited. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Reference added to Commons as well. A455bcd9 (talk) 19:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Mike Christie and A455bcd9: - It looks like these issues have been resolved through citing or removing the uncited text. Is this article good to remove from WP:FARGIVEN and mark as satisfactory at WP:URFA/2020? Hog Farm Talk 04:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the reminder @Hog Farm:  Done a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 07:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sfn

[edit]

Mike Christie this article is very different from the one you got promoted to FAC in 2007, and I am thinking of tidying the references and sources. Would it be OK with you if I convert them to sfn? Dudley Miles (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure -- I'm not a fan of sfn, but I'm not the only person who keeps an eye on this page so go ahead. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm not a fan of sfn either, but if you're keen to use it to harmonise the references then fair enough :-) Alarichall (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
It is not to harmonise the references but because I find it makes editing much easier as it alerts me to mistakes which I would otherwise miss. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply