Talk:Anderson impurity model
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Sodin in topic Untitled
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anderson impurity model article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
[edit]Shouldn't the subscript j in the first equation in the term containing V* be below the c instead of below the f? And shouldn't the subscripts j be omitted in the final term in the first equation altogether, if only one impurity is taken into account? Erwin 10:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Indeed you are correct, well spotted. PhysicsBob 12:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
What is described here is the so-called "Anderson impurity model". There is also the "Anderson model" used in the context of the Anderson transition, i.e. a lattice with random on-site energies and fixed hopping energy ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.187.160.240 (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- What about adding a disambig page? For now, the options will be A.imp.model (linking here) and a link to A.transition.Sasha (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- no comments, so I happily implemented my own suggestion :) Sasha (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)