Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f13beed91c6fa

Jump to content

Talk:Analytic proof

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 31.52.254.181 in topic Two unconnected bits

Some tasks

[edit]

Should add:

  • Why is analytic proof interesting?
  • Analytic proof in other systems;
  • Explain the connection to proof-theoretic semantics;
  • Talk about translations between notions of analytic proof, and the notion of richness of analytic proof.

--- Charles Stewart(talk) 10:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

In reference to analytic proof systems, the description in this article seems rather confusing and indirect. The term "analytic proof system" was used by Smullyan in the preface of his First-Order Logic book (1968). There he means any proof system that satisfies the subformula proporty. Cut-free proofs are an example: many others are as well. Seems like a good definition and reference to make here. --Dale Miller 129.104.11.1 (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Two unconnected bits

[edit]

Analytic proof in mathematics and analytic proof in proof theory are different and indeed unconnected with one another! 31.52.254.181 (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply