Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24107f53963ee28

Jump to content

Talk:Amy Acker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Bismuth43 in topic Discussion of Best Lead Image for Page.
[edit]

Is this article still a stub? I'm curious as to what length and depth of information an article has to reach before it can be officially de-stubbed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Great and Powerful Illyria (talkcontribs) 05:00, 28 January 2005.

It's not a matter of word count, it's a matter of how completely the subject has been covered. Something little more than a dictionary definition is definitely a stub. Something with obvious holes or which seems incompletely written is a stub. There is no hard objective definition; it's a matter of perception. Canonblack 13:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

As herself?? Some kind of joke? Acker does not play "herself" in season five of Angel.

Those credits are for featurettes on the Angel DVDs, in which she does indeed play herself. --Bacteria 02:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Spoilers

[edit]

Don't you think that having the picture of Amy Acker as Illyria on the front page is a bit of a spoiler? --King Bee 16:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • I would say it is NOT a spoiler, since...how would you know what Illyria is before you see her on the show? It all happens in one episode. for someone just seeing that picture for the first time, they would have no idea what to think. SnaX 01:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ancestry

[edit]

Is she German-Jewish or German on her paternal side? Acker clearly is a German surname. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.94.186.41 (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Her ancestry is traced here and here. Her patrilineal line goes back to a Peter Acker, who was born in either Hunterdon Co., New Jersey, or in Germany, c. 1728, to John William Acker and Anna Dirdoff, who were German immigrants. So she has some distant German ancestry (and she isn't of Jewish heritage). All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 07:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vile

[edit]

Why is that movie listed in her filmography? She isn't mentioned neither on the Wikipedia page for the movie nor on IMDb. Kumagoro-42 18:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)  Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumagoro-42 (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Acker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Special Unit 2 -- Credit Verification Issue

[edit]

I am questioning the credit for Special Unit 2 (2001) that is listed in her filmography.

I watched the episode multiple times and was unable to find her anywhere.

A link to the episode can be found here to verify my supposition:

https://archive.org/details/Special_Unit_2_S02E04_The_Invisible

It is not listed on her official website: (https://amyacker.com)

And on https://amyacker.org, a comprehensive documentation site for images of Amy Acker, it lists the credit on her homepage but has zero images despite their thorough coverage of all her other roles.

IMDB does list her as "Nancy" in the episode 2x04 "The Invisible". However, there is no further information on the character on IMDB.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0706573/characters/nm0009918/?ref_=tt_cst_c_6

I plan to check that there is a Nancy character at all and to determine who plays that character.

Through interviews I was aware that she had moved from Texas to Los Angeles. and was cast for a guest star role on the last episodes of Angel S2. She became main cast on Angel for S3 with the first episode of Angel S3 airing in 09/24/2001. The episode of "Special Unit 2" aired on 10/21/2001 respectively.

According to Wikipedia it was filmed in Vancouver, British Columbia; and Chicago, Illinois.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Unit_2

According to Variety, "Filmed in Los Angeles by Rego Park Film & Television in association with Paramount Network Television."

https://variety.com/2001/tv/reviews/special-unit-2-1200467780/

The conflicting filming locations make it difficult to assess the logistics of whether she could have appeared in the episode while filming Angel in Los Angeles.

This has been repeatedly echoed through countless sites, I would assume by referencing IMDB's filmography of Amy Acker.

Because of all of this, I would recommend that the credit be removed. Bismuth43 (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Discussion of Best Lead Image for Page.

[edit]

@Emiya1980: Rather than continuing to revert, I was thinking we might be able to find an image that neither of us have issues with. My image has issues with cropping and a reduction in profile visibility. I take issue with your preference for lead image in that it’s cropped from a group photo already on the page. I figure taking the image on her IMDB from the SXSW Much Ado photoshoot in 2012 would be a bit redundant, but I'm open to options that qualify for fair use or creative commons. Bismuth43 (talk) 00:22, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Assuming it provides a full view of her profile, I have no objection to using her image on IMDB. Emiya1980 (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The IMDB image is apparently from Getty Images which means it does not apply for fair use. I'll look for a decent alternative image. Any ideas you would put forward? Bismuth43 (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply