Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24070fdca43f3c9

Jump to content

Talk:Amtrak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by ~2026-27363-61 in topic Imprecise Rail CO2 Claim
Former good articleAmtrak was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 10, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 23, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education assignment: Multimedia Writing and Rhetoric

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2026 and 29 April 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nschafe3atND (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nschafe3atND (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Imprecise Rail CO2 Claim

[edit]

Current article states: "Rail creates less carbon dioxide emissions than flying for trips up to and beyond 1,100 miles, but its CO2 advantage fade on longer routes past 500 miles."

"Up to and beyond" is technically meaningless. Additionally "its CO2 advantage fade on longer routes past 500 miles." is imprecise.

Based on the source cited, both diesel and electric rail on average provide CO2 advantages over air for transit up to 1,100 miles, the maximum range provided in the paper's figures.

Diesel powered rail advantages over air peak at ~500 mile trips, while electric powered rail advantages continue to increase up to 1,100 miles.

Propose revising the statement to "Both diesel and electric powered rail create less CO2 emissions per passenger than air travel. Diesel powered rail's advantages over air peak at approximately 500 mile trips, while electric powered rail's advantages continue to climb as travel distances increase." ~2026-27363-61 (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply