Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a252ac91e8c95a3a

Jump to content

Talk:Amphiuma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Jwikip in topic Plurals?!

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kingkl, Kuponya, Biologicalamphibian. Peer reviewers: Kingkl.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Name

[edit]

Why is it called a "Congo eel" if it resides in the southeastern United States? -Alex, 12.220.157.93 22:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC).Reply

Because people come up with all kinds of local nicknames. Amphiumas are also called "Conger eels" in some places, which is an actual species of marine eel. MFuture 22:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Which "Congo" are we refering to, btw? The river, the general area, the people, one of the countries? --Palnatoke 08:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I doubt it refers to the Congo the river, people or country -- I suspect it's slang for the Congaree River. I found this that claims that the two-toed amphiuma can be found in the vicinity of Congaree National Park. --71.76.39.125 (talk) 03:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy

[edit]

Re this section: "They are also known as "Congo eels" or "Congo snakes", which are zoologically incorrect designations." - What makes "congo eel" zoologically incorrect? According to the Integrated Taxonomic Information Service, Congo eel is a valid common name. Just curious... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.168.138.58 (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

That they aren't actually eels, presumably. An accepted name, but an inaccurate one, like slow worm or mantis shrimp. Daibhid C (talk) 20:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vestigial organs

[edit]

Are the Amphiuma's legs vestigial? Do they have any use? The article just explains that they're very tiny (and the picture puts it into perspective)... So I have a hard time thinking they'd be able to move its body at all. Elecbullet (talk) 07:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, please, no creation v. evolution debates.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amphiuma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Two-toed?

[edit]

looks to me like the top one in the picture has three toes in each foot. 209.128.31.98 (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

There are two different animals in the image, one is A. means (the two-toed Amphiuma) the other is A. tridactylum (three-toed).
After verifying the wikimedia image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Descriptiones_et_icones_amphibiorum_(19277946523).jpg, I shall make the change to the caption in this article. . jw (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Caption change done, with some minor improvements to text.
Further work is required - see Plural section , below / jw (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Plurals?!

[edit]
  • This article needs further review, regarding the use of plurals and singular forms of verbs in some sentences in the text.

jw (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply