Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22201bf589648fc

Jump to content

Talk:Ames process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Bencherlite in topic File:Ames Process.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Calcium or magnesium ?

[edit]


I read the 1958 patent of the Ames process by Spedding et al. Spedding said that he originally tried to use calcium metal to extract uranium metal from its tetrafluoride; however, the process produced a low yield of heavily contaminated uranium. He found that magnesium produced much better results. The patent for the Ames process is therefore limited to a uranium extraction process that involves magnesium, not calcium. Cwkmail (talk) 04:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Ames Process.jpg to appear as POTD soon

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Ames Process.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 26, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-02-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks!  Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ames process
The Ames process was developed during the Manhattan Project to refine uranium. Left to right:
  • Pressure vessel containing uranium halide and sacrificial metal being lowered into a furnace
  • After the reaction, remnant slag in the container
  • Uranium metal "biscuit" end product
Photographs: Unknown
Date updated. BencherliteTalk 21:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply