Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2276ddb5e6577be

Jump to content

Talk:Americium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleAmericium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2010Good article nomineeListed
September 29, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
February 15, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
May 2, 2026Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 20, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the discovery of chemical elements curium and americium (americium compound pictured) was first announced on a radio show for children in 1945?
Current status: Good article

Pronunciation?

[edit]

No explanation of the correct pronunciation. This would be a useful addition!

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed uncited statements, especially in the "Isotopes" section. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues have been resolved Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:44, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uncited statements, especially in the "Isotopes" section. Z1720 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look. If you could mark uncited statements with {{cn}}, that would be helpful for me. — hike395 (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see some possible ENGVAR mixing. The article is tagged {{Use dmy dates}}, and that's what seems to be used in the body. That's British(ish). But the article is consistent with US "color" and "neighbor" types of spellings. DMacks (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
MOS:DATETIES explicitly says that date format is independent of the national variety of English. Element articles are broad enough IMO that this topic is not so strongly American, so using DMY is fine. 1brianm7 (talk) 07:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Z1720: Adding references for all of the {{cn}} you've added. — hike395 (talk) 14:10, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.