Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d76d95a791ef0

Jump to content

Talk:America is back

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 08:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Created by Chetsford (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 160 past nominations.

Chetsford (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • New enough (nominated same day as creation), long enough (2235 characters). Well sourced to books, news articles, academic journals, think tank articles and transcripts. (AGF on 2 of the books that appear to be offline.) Written factually and neutrally. Earwig suggests copyvio unlikely. QPQ is done. All 3 hooks could pass, but ALT0 and ALT1 are better than the other one, which could be interpreted as a political statement or run into the song lyric quote problem, whereas the other two actually nicely summarize the whole article while fitting the tone of the quirky slot. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Neologisms

[edit]

This does not appear to be a neologism as there is documentation of the catchphrase existing for at least 50 years. Per our policy, a neologism is a newly coined word or phrase. Given that, is there objection to removal of the maintenance template? Chetsford (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

As there has been no objection or, indeed, discussion of any kind, I have removed the template per item eight of WP:WTRMT. Chetsford (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply