Talk:Amejo
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amejo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Categories for "Race" and "Sexual Fetishism"
[edit]I placed two categories for "Race" (since this interest is racial) and for "Sexual fetishism" (since some of these relationships are obviously sexual), and they were specifically removed by user: TakuyaMurata. Edit
Rather than get into an edit war, I would like to get the reason it is felt they are not appropriate...--Joel Lindley (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, I didn't remove the categories. But I agree with the removal because putting such categories might not be NPOV. -- Taku (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- I understand. Since the article is new, I guess we'll just see how it goes from there.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- This terms seems either made up or not widely used. I think this makes it problematic for inclusion here. Is there a Wikipedia Japan page with this term? If not, this term is bs. --Soda80 (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- How is the term "BS" if there are reputable sources for the terms?--Joel Lindley (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
merge article
[edit]two terms which deserve no article YVNP (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this isn't a forum on our personal opinions on terms or articles; but, whether or not it fits Wikipedia. If you feel you can add to it, do so.--Joel Lindley (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Please confirm classification
[edit]The WikiProject classification for Amejo is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
