Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This page was nominated for deletion on 13 December 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.
Latest comment: 7 months ago11 comments2 people in discussion
Saludos. Necesito orientación respecto al borrador “Amaruk Kayshapanta”, el cual fue creado inicialmente por mí.
Después de revisar las políticas de Wikipedia, he notado que el contenido podría no cumplir con los criterios de relevancia enciclopédica, presenta un tono que podría considerarse no enciclopédico y carece de suficientes fuentes fiables e independientes.
Por ese motivo, deseo saber cuál es el procedimiento adecuado para solicitar su eliminación o si corresponde marcarlo con la plantilla de borrado. Mi intención es actuar correctamente según las normas y evitar conflictos de edición.
Hello. I have received a notification that my account has been partially blocked for “Edit warring; DE.”
I would like to request a review of this block, as my intention was not to participate in an edit war. My goal was to correct or improve content in accordance with Wikipedia’s policies, but I acknowledge that I may have edited repeatedly without first using the discussion page to resolve disagreements. I commit to resolving any conflicts through discussion pages and to not editing the blocked pages while this block is in effect. I kindly request that the partial block be reviewed or that the exact limits of the affected pages be clarified to avoid future issues.
Additionally, I am seeking guidance regarding the draft “Amaruk Kayshapanta,” which I originally created. After reviewing Wikipedia policies, I have noticed that the content may not meet the criteria for encyclopedic relevance, has a tone that could be considered non-encyclopedic, and lacks sufficient reliable and independent sources.
I would like to know the proper procedure for requesting its deletion or whether it should be tagged with a deletion template. My intention is to act in full accordance with the rules and to avoid any editing conflicts.
Hi! Thank you for switching to English. This draft is not eligible for requested deletion as other editors have edited it. You're welcome to file at WP:MFD @Gatita Estrella10, but it's better to let other editors like @Maryna Fryda work on it to see if they can improve it to meet notability requirements. Let me know if that's helpful StarMississippi03:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello, thank you for the clarification.
I understand that the draft cannot be deleted directly due to edits made by third parties. However, I would like to make it clear that my position is to request its deletion, as I believe that the draft Amaruk Kayshapnta does not meet the criteria for encyclopedic or educational relevance.
The content focuses almost exclusively on aspects of the subject’s personal life, without providing reliable, independent, secondary sources that demonstrate notability in accordance with Wikipedia policies. In its current state, the text does not provide encyclopedic or informative value.
For this reason, I am not interested in developing or publishing it, and I believe the most appropriate course of action is to propose it at WP:MFD so that the community can evaluate its deletion in line with current policies.
Hello @Estrella Mississippi, thank you for your guidance.
I would like to reaffirm my position regarding the draft “Amaruk Kayshapanta” and propose its deletion for the following reasons, in accordance with Wikipedia policies:
Lack of encyclopedic relevance (notability): the draft does not have sufficient coverage in independent and reliable sources that support its significance.
Promotional tone: the content resembles a résumé or promotional material rather than an encyclopedic article.
Third-party edits with promotional intent: these modifications reinforce the perception of self-promotion, which is relevant according to Wikipedia guidelines.
For these reasons, I consider that the draft clearly does not meet the criteria for encyclopedic relevance, and the appropriate course of action is to propose it at WP:MFD so that the community can evaluate its deletion in accordance with Wikipedia policies.
Since this is my deletion request, I prefer that no further edits or developments be made to the draft while the proposal is being evaluated, to avoid confusion or complications during the process. This request is made respectfully and in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, and it does not imply vandalism or conflict with other editors. Gatita Estrella10 (talk) 20:44, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
People are welcome and encouraged to edit and improve articles as it's the potential of the subject that is being evaluated, not the current state of the article. While you're welcome to nominate it at MFD, you will not be able to preclude anyone from editing it then, or at any other time. Since you are blocked from editing the article already, I will open the discussion on your behalf. You are welcome to contribute to that discussion. StarMississippi21:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Star Mississippi, I hope you are doing well. My apologies for any inconvenience or misunderstanding caused; I acknowledge it was due to a lack of familiarity with some aspects of the process. I appreciate the clarification. If possible, I would be grateful for you guidance on how to proceed correctly according to Wikipedia's polices to avoid unintentional errors in the future. Thank you for your time and support. Gatita Estrella10 (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome to participate in the discussion. I understand you and some editors believe it should be deleted, while others believe it should be retained. If it is retained, you can request that your block be lifted but you will not be allowed to blank the text or move the draft. Is that helpful? StarMississippi17:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Additional clarification:
To clarify my previous comment, my main concern is not the basic biographical information, but that the draft presents a largely curricular and promotional approach, with limited coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources that provide in-depth analysis demonstrating the subject’s notability in accordance with Wikipedia policies. For this reason, I believe it does not clearly meet the criteria for encyclopedic relevance. Gatita Estrella10 (talk) 17:17, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
