Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f64c5aa90554f

Jump to content

Talk:Amanda Lear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by (Walker Snarling) in topic Section "Gender Identity" should be deleted

Section "Gender Identity" should be deleted

[edit]

Hello, this article is about a notable female singer. She became famous in the 1960s. If there has been a gender transition in her life (just assumed here for the sake of conversation), then that must have happened before she became notable. Following the rules, rumours about a gender transition, a previous male identity, male name etc. should be deleted from the article. This concerns mostly, but not only, the section "Gender identity". Ziko (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, because there were and are too many contemporary witnesses who still knew Amanda when she did her gender reassignment surgery. What you want would mean to label these contemporary witnesses as liars and that would also be legally critical. Amanda also came out herself at the time to push her career. The fact that she denied everything afterwards is due to her inferiority complex. In this particular case, this section should definitely be preserved. 91.51.106.118 (talk) 12:10, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't think policy blocks talking about the rumored transition, but you're right that it does block actually giving the alleged previous name. Sesquilinear (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just delete the section. No serious sources. La Stampa uses fantasy in this case. Novella 2000 at times claims ther are 3 headed people. It is a joke source. The other sources are not any better. As a matter of common sense what happened to her Adam's apple? She was well known in Italy and all female. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 03:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Well, my knee jerk reaction is to support removal of crap that's unreliably sourced. But that sole source is not the only one to discuss it. When third-party reliable sources discuss it to the point of WP:DUEWEIGHT, it gets included. See Imane Khelif for another subject whose gender/biosex touch directly on notability and career. If this subject were a politician, writer, or scientist, it might matter a great deal less. But womanhood is a big part of this subject's biographical significance. Nuances on her womanhood appear reasonable to an uncertain extent. Let's resolve the uncertainty by finding the metes and bounds there. JFHJr () 22:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
As a matter of common sense what happened to her Adam's apple? Really not a good argument. Anyway, I oppose removal on the grounds that it's actually fairly well sources, La Stampa is a respected newspaper. Snokalok (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's not just that source, either. The Guardian is quoted earlier in the article noting that uncertainties about her include whether she was born a girl or a boy. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 01:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
wait...do you seriously not know that Adam's apples can be surgically removed lol? She is OBVIOUSLY trans, come on. You can literally see her facial and neck scars in certain pictures. I'm trans and I find it extremely cowardly that she tries to hide it, even still in 2026...spineless (Walker Snarling) (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply