Talk:Am486

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Back]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.
[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Through cache strategy]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.
[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Back cache strategy]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I ran a small computer shop in the 1993-1996 time period; I'm curious that the AMD 496DX-50, 486DX2-100, and 486DX4-160 aren't mentioned. I've still got my -160 machine around for DOS applications that simply will not run in an emulator.````

I had an AMD 486-DXdontknowanymore 133 overclocked to 160 and it worked like a charm. 87.142.221.18 (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Am486

untitled