Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2327b0bb8f2a9c0

Jump to content

Talk:Alweg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dennis McClendon in topic LA rejection

LA rejection

[edit]

The musings of whoever wrote the transportation chapter for the 2013 ASCE publication don’t seem like particularly reliable evidence for why the LA proposal was rejected. It doesn’t identify which “Standard Oil Company,” for instance, and sound like a hazy conflation with the GM streetcar conspiracy.

By contrast, all the newspaper accounts of the time make clear the problems MTA had identified with the monorail proposal and with Alweg’s financing scheme. Auto advocates are never mentioned; in fact, everyone involved seems interested in bringing a modern mass transit system to LA.

Ray Bradbury's musings half a century later seem pretty peripheral to such a brief article.

Dennis McClendon (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

[edit]

The ALWEG Archives are hopelessly disorganized: can anybody figure out eg.

  • if the company's name was "ALWEG" or "Alweg"
  • what the name comes from
  • when Alweg Europe ceased operations
  • when Wegematic was founded and dissolved
  • when Hitachi-Alweg became just Hitachi

...? Jpatokal 05:57, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)


"The [LA] City Council rejected the proposal in favor of transit at all."

The above appears to be a typo, but I'm not certain what the intent was.--Jkiang 00:20, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)