Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a263f252df8a36cd

Jump to content

Talk:Alto clarinet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 74.95.43.253 in topic "Low volume"?

"Tenor clarinet"

[edit]

is this really also called the Tenor Clarinet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.197.86 (talkcontribs)

Yes, particularly in England. See Rendall (first cited reference). -- Rsholmes 15:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability

[edit]

Instead of "because some of the most beautiful notes (written C to F) in the upper register of the alto clarinet have the same pitch as the weaker-toned middle-register notes (written F to B♭) of the B♭ soprano clarinet", we should say (in this way sounding better in an artistic context and also sounding more inclusive): notes (written C to F) in the upper register of the alto clarinet have OPPOSITE CHARACTERISTICS to those of the same pitched middle-register notes (written F to B♭) in the B♭ soprano clarinet. Then it naturally deserves well a niche in the tones palette of the woodwinds. 193.126.182.70 (talk) 13:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomenclature

[edit]

Concerning [Differences in nomenclature], it is not fair to take by reference to octaves, because the relation between octaves and registers is significantly different between e.g. saxophones and clarinets. 89.180.35.58 (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Low volume"?

[edit]

From the last section: "Arguments for its removal include its relatively low volume..."

If that were a valid argument it would also argue for the removal of all the soprano clarinets and the bass clarinet as well -- the alto easily produces as much volume as any of these. There is a footnote to this statement "explaining" it, but no references are cited.

As to "its part is often doubled by other instruments", that is a matter of composition, and not of the instrument. In fact the reverse is actually the case: it's not a matter of other instruments doubling the alto clarinet part, it's that hack band writers too frequently use the alto clarinet to double either the 3rd clarinets or the alto saxophones. But there is nothing preventing the writing of independent alto clarinet parts, or using the instrument (as it should be) as a natural part of the clarinet choir. Nothing except, perhaps, a lack of compositional talent.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply