Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f0b0e4c4aea0a

Jump to content

Talk:Alternativity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AquitaneHungerForce in topic Alternativity implies power associativity

Untitled

[edit]

Hello

is there a word for ?

Robinh 13:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The word is flexible. We don't seem to have anything on Wikipedia, but PlanetMath has an entry on flexible algebras. --Zundark 16:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

We do now have flexible algebra. —Toby Bartels (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


Added the technical tag. Could we maybe add a concrete example (perhaps an alternative ring?) Furthermore in the same vein as the page for Associative, we should maybe describe it in the general sense of arithmetic before moving on to abstract algebra. --140.211.90.206 (talk) 19:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alternativity implies power associativity

[edit]

The article currently claims:

In fact, an alternative magma need not even be power-associative: already the expression cannot be proven to be identical to expressions such as purely by alternativity.

However this seems false? It seems that with only left-alternativity this can be shown. Restated left-alternativity is , let then this is . The exact statement which it states cannot be proven. I'm removing this claim. Let me know if I am mistaken or misunderstanding. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 20:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply