Talk:Alt-tech
Add topic| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alt-tech article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
X
[edit]Should X also be classified as an alt-tech platform for now? The German parties SPD (Social Democrats), Die Linke (The Left) and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Greens) have left this platform because X would support political desinformation.[1] ~2026-27991-15 (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- @~2026-27991-15 I think we would need to find a reliable source that describes X as an alt-tech platform, which is not the case for the source you linked. I've found two sources that might support something like this: describes it as "something ideologically alt-tech adjacent, and yet institutionally unique"; is specifically about Brazil. I'm not sure if that website itself is a reliable source, but Viktor Chagas is an associate professor in a field relevant to this.
- I don't think that's enough to include it in the list, but I think a paragraph in the article about X's relation to the alt-tech sphere would be an appropriate addition. Jcuhfehl (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Alt-tech refers to the alt-right
[edit]To the user who has edited the lead of the article, you will need to provide a citation if you want to claim that alt-tech simply refers to "alternative" -- as opposed to "alt-tech", which seems to be the widely understood meaning across the article. The citation listed at the end of the claim you modified carries proof of this:
> Not all communities that have been deplatformed and found other ways to exist online should be considered alt-tech [...] We use the alt-tech term to refer to platforms that offer a promise of uncensored speech, which exist specifically to give a space for far-right, nationalist, racist, or extremist points of view, and which harbor a broad sense of grievance that speech has been “censored” for failure to be “politically correct.”
(https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/deplatforming-our-way-to-the-alt-tech-ecosystem)
If you believe your edit was justified, please feel free to put it back, but you'll need to provide some kind of justification. You can reply here or provide a citation in your edit which backs up your claim. I'm reverting it for now. ShadowLancer (talk) 03:45, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- All Websites articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
