Talk:Alpha Piscium
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Distance
[edit]Simbad gives a parallax of 21.66 [mas] which corresponds to a distance of around 150 lightyears or 46pc. The distance in ly differs from the article while the distance in pc is identical to the included number backed by a referenced article. --Soulblydd (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Long-exposure observation
[edit]This section and its title contributes nothing to the article and should be deleted. Is it something to do with astrology? Robin Scagell (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that the text bares little relation to the heading, and the text is actually about the position of the star, not the star itself. Unless someone speaks up to defend its inclusion within the next week, I think the entire section should be removed. YCVn (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Properties
[edit]The statement 'and they will make their closest approach to each other around 2060.' needs a reference. The table of positions in Stelle Doppie (https://www.stelledoppie.it/index2.php?iddoppia=7550) shows that the most recent close approach was in 2012. I am not a double-star observer, so don't feel competent to make an edit, but there is clearly something very strange about this article. Robin Scagell (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)