Talk:Allow Me/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good job! This is a very good article, certainly one worthy of GA status. My one suggestion: provide some context for the tin can Allow Me seems to be holding in the second image. Otherwise, you get a pass! Congrats! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article. The image name contains "Tin Squibbles", but I am not sure what this refers to, hence why I omitted details from the caption. --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.