Talk:Allenby Formation

Proposed merge from Princeton Chert

Subtopic of the Allenby formation, with much shared/same information— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevmin (talk • contribs) 21:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I disagree with the idea of merging the Princeton Chert article with the Allenby Formation article. The Princeton Chert is a significant Eocene fossil site, and the article highlights this point. It is therefore more a paleontology article than an article about a rock formation. Eocene guy (talk) 22:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Allenby Formation has been called part of a "Great Canadian Lagerstätte"? Source: "Archibald et al 2011)
  • ALT1: ... that the Allenby Formation has been compared to the Virunga Mountains in the African rift valley? Source: "DeVore 2020" )
• Note: Reviewed Euphorbia nivulia of the nomination.

• Reviewed: Euphorbia caducifolia

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 23:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC).

• over 5x expansion from 419 to 7196 bytes; all sources appear reliable (based on Google searches); every paragraph, quote, and list entry is cited; article neutral; no copyvio detected (AGF on paywalled sources). Hooks are cited, not long, and interesting; ALT0 is good to go, but ALT1 (and the sentence in the article) needs clarification on what "compared" entails (are they similar? In which aspects?). QPQ done. eviolite (talk) 23:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)