Talk:All-Bran
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Fair use rationale for Image:All-bran.cbx.jpg
[edit]
Image:All-bran.cbx.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Neutrality issue in the "History" section
[edit]Hello, I noticed that the sentence "Unfortunately, it reformulated its classic recipe in 2025, to ‘reduce food waste and streamline production’, resulting in an ultraprocessed, tasteless cereal that alienated longtime lovers of the cereal" violates the NPOV policy. The adjective "tasteless" is subjective and unsupported by sources. I suggest revising it to: "In 2025, the classic recipe was reformulated to reduce food waste and streamline production, as announced by [official source]." What do you think? 95.245.156.195 (talk) 00:42, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- I completely agree. This is not an encyclopedic, neutral way of writing. I also think the sentence belongs in the history section, not in the introduction. Tynnoel (talk) 08:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)