Talk:Algolia
Add topic | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... the nominator has failed to read CSD#A7 --Andy Dingley (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
POV
[edit]This entire article really reads like promotional material for the company's product. --Kooky (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Performed some edits and hence removed banner. --Wiki-observer (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
SeaUrchin acquiring
[edit]Algolia has acquired /seaurchin at 14 Mar 2018, see https://blog.algolia.com/algolia-acquires-seaurchin-io/, some news articles about this:
- https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/14/algolia-adds-search-analytics-so-that-you-can-optimize-your-search-results/
- http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/News/News/Algolia-Acquires-SeaUrchin.IO-123833.aspx
- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/algolia-acquires-seaurchinio----bringing-real-time-search-analytics-to-40b-queries-a-month-300613414.html
- https://www.frenchweb.fr/algolia-rachete-la-technologie-seaurchin-io/319899
- https://sdtimes.com/analy/search-provider-algolia-acquires-seaurchin-io-enhance-insights/
- https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=301785911
Wasn't really sure how to add it, but someone else should — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.14.205.82 (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement
[edit]You could very easily argue that everything after the "Company" section is merely promotional material... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thosakwe (talk • contribs) 00:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with that. Most of the sources past there are either primary or trash like Github anyway. Its to extensive detail and uses a bunch of buzzwords anyway. So I suggest the parts after the company section be deleted.
Promotional
[edit]I've cut down a lot of this article and removed the advert tag. If anyone still thinks it's too promo like, feel free to replace the tag. Local Variable (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)