Talk:Alex Cross
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Feminist in topic Requested move 7 February 2025
 | On 7 February 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Alex Cross (novel series) to Alex Cross. The result of the discussion was moved. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge section
[edit]The Antagonists section here is a duplication of the Notable Antagonists section in the novel series article; do we really need both of them? Swanny18 (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
One of the most poorly written articles I've ever read on this site. Sentence fragments, horrible grammar, large amounts of obvious opinions... Someone fix this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.145.147 (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's quite appropriate. The article was clearly written by a member of his target audience. See also: Dunning–Kruger_effect 204.111.123.38 (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
TV series
[edit]A tv adaptation has been announced from Amazon Studios and Skydance Television.
A draft is in the works. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 7 February 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🩸 (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Alex Cross (novel series) → Alex Cross – Target currently redirects here after a 2022 AfD resulted in the deletion of the article about the namesake character. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 13:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 00:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QuietHere Instead of moving the novel series I would say we should Movie the series main character to Alex Cross Cause it seems the Series character is more Popular than the novels. Afro 📢Talk! 14:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Pageviews would have it the other way around, where the novels have been the more viewed article consistently for as long as the data has been tracked. That may not be the most reliable measure seeing as all three films came out well before the start of that data, but it's still a decade's worth of info and is worth taking into account. I would also argue that, while I don't believe there are any formal guidelines regarding this, in my experience adaptations tend to take the backseat to the original work when it comes to PTOPIC (unless the adaptation is overwhelmingly more notable, such as First Blood and The Godfather). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QuietHere I understand your point, but the fact remains that the novel still revolves around Alex as the main character. For example, many die-hard Thor fans might not even realize that a novel about Thor was released long before the movies. Yet, the character who has become more notable is still the figure himself. The same goes for Alex Cross – the name represents the fictional character at the center of the novel. Afro 📢Talk! 14:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ohhh, hold on a sec. I thought you were referring to the film series because you said "movie" but meant "move". Ignore what I wrote then. As for your point about the character, I think my initial proposal already covers that; the page was for the character, but that article was deleted via AfD. Three years isn't a ton of time for notability, especially for a character whose popularity peaked decades ago. I see that Alex Cross (character) exists (and that you created it), but I'm not sure that would survive a second AfD. Most of the sources in that article are about the movies/TV series rather than the character himself, and I'm not sure the ones that are about the character are reliable (especially not Passionate in Marketing, nor the reference to another Wikipedia article which I know for a fact is against the rules). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also, you don't need to ping me in every message. I have notifications on for this discussion so I'll know about your message either way. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- noted wasn't my intention to ping u probably didn't even notice it that's just the way the mobile app was programmed my bad. As for the character page which I did create am sure there are many tons of reliable source about the character him self online just need a lil bit of searching Afro 📢Talk! 15:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also, you don't need to ping me in every message. I have notifications on for this discussion so I'll know about your message either way. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ohhh, hold on a sec. I thought you were referring to the film series because you said "movie" but meant "move". Ignore what I wrote then. As for your point about the character, I think my initial proposal already covers that; the page was for the character, but that article was deleted via AfD. Three years isn't a ton of time for notability, especially for a character whose popularity peaked decades ago. I see that Alex Cross (character) exists (and that you created it), but I'm not sure that would survive a second AfD. Most of the sources in that article are about the movies/TV series rather than the character himself, and I'm not sure the ones that are about the character are reliable (especially not Passionate in Marketing, nor the reference to another Wikipedia article which I know for a fact is against the rules). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QuietHere I understand your point, but the fact remains that the novel still revolves around Alex as the main character. For example, many die-hard Thor fans might not even realize that a novel about Thor was released long before the movies. Yet, the character who has become more notable is still the figure himself. The same goes for Alex Cross – the name represents the fictional character at the center of the novel. Afro 📢Talk! 14:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Pageviews would have it the other way around, where the novels have been the more viewed article consistently for as long as the data has been tracked. That may not be the most reliable measure seeing as all three films came out well before the start of that data, but it's still a decade's worth of info and is worth taking into account. I would also argue that, while I don't believe there are any formal guidelines regarding this, in my experience adaptations tend to take the backseat to the original work when it comes to PTOPIC (unless the adaptation is overwhelmingly more notable, such as First Blood and The Godfather). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support as even if the character had his own article (which he doesn't right now), the novel series itself should still be the primary subject. ToThAc (talk) 02:27, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @ToThAc just for clarification, there is Alex Cross (character). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 03:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QuietHere: My bad. I thought you meant the character didn't have an article thanks to the AfD you mentioned. ToThAc (talk) 13:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @ToThAc oh no, I did mean that. I didn't know about that article when I wrote that. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 20:53, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QuietHere: My bad. I thought you meant the character didn't have an article thanks to the AfD you mentioned. ToThAc (talk) 13:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @ToThAc just for clarification, there is Alex Cross (character). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 03:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom, common sense primary topic for the term. BD2412 T 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.