Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24c3b3abb55c78f

Jump to content

Talk:Al Pfeifer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by JTtheOG in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Al Pfeifer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 14:58, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: JTtheOG (talk · contribs) 19:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


Hi there. I'll be conducting this Good Article review! JTtheOG (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Early life and college

[edit]
  • Link first mention of senior
  • What does Eastern refer to? I'm thinking adding something like "region" would provide context, but I don't know enough about the time period to definitively say.

Professional career

[edit]
  • Link first mention of U.S. Army in Giants section instead of second mention in Argonauts section
  • Pfeifer finished his stint in Toronto with team records for most career 100-yard games with 17 and most 100-yard games in a season with eight seems a bit redundant. Can I suggest something like: Pfeifer finished his stint in Toronto with team records for most 100-yard games in a career (17) and in a season (eight)?

Personal life and legacy

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Add |via=[[Newspapers.com to applicable citations
  • To avoid WP:REFCLUTTER and adhere more closely to WP:TSI, I'd recommend moving the PFA ref right after the comma on the first sentence of the 1955 season paragraph.
    • Also, the mention of the interception at the end of the paragraph seems a bit out of place. I think it would be better suited if it were moved into an earlier part of the paragraph, with the rest of his personal stats.
  • Source check
    • Source 6: Original date of the AP story is May 5, so that looks to be when he was signed.
    • Source 1g: PFA is only showing me receiving touchdowns for 1951 and 1953. The rows for those years are empty for every other stat.
    • Long illness not verified by PFA.

General comments

[edit]
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Copyvio score looks good
  • Free image used

I believe I addressed everything. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.