Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2619b04bbf7f43c

Jump to content

Talk:Akai MPC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by B3251 in topic GA Review

List of different machines

[edit]

Hello everyone! Thank you for the recent works on this page, it looks much better now. However I was wondering if it made sense to still keep a list of the different models of MPCs, maybe with their release date. I'm thinking it would be consistent with other stand out wikipedia articles about series of product, such as the iPhone series, the PlayStation series, the Fort F series or the Nikon E series. --2A01:CB04:75:3300:3AE3:C5EA:EEB1:52A7 (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Incorporating a list of different models would be a good addition, but everything we add must be sourced properly (as it is on the PlayStation article). We can't allow the article to become another untamed jungle of technical information without proper sourcing or discretion about what's included, as it was not so long ago (see this revision). Popcornduff (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Akai MPC/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 14:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: B3251 (talk · contribs) 20:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


While working on a review for this, I noticed that the nominator's only contribution towards the article is running IABot to auto-archive the sources, which is practically textbook drive-by nominating given that the nominator made no real contributions towards the actual article content. Quickfailing for drive-by nomination, but I'm happy to review it in the future if significant changes to the article's content itself is made. B3251(talk) 20:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.