Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2ac297b2ac8c77b

Jump to content

Talk:Ajmer-Merwara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Bhvintri in topic year end should be 1947

year end should be 1947

[edit]

When the article itself that 'It became a part of independent India on 15 August 1947 when the British left India' Also, the successor state Ajmer State of independent India came into existence in 1947. Please explain why we want to keep the year end as 1936. As what happened to this Province after 1936 and what was the successor Province from 1936 to 1947. Else I will be reverting the year end to 1947 next week. Bhvintri (talk) 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

As I noted in my reversion comments, the edit was not explained or supported by a citation. I am not sure a discussion here is required. Feel free to make the change again, but explain it when you make the change. See WP:UNRESPONSIVE. A discussion here is not a substitute for explanation when making the edit.

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 06:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Material under 'See also'

[edit]

There are two issues with the material in the 'See also' section. First, the material currently under 'See also' is miscategorized and should be more appropriate under the 'Notes and references' section. See MOS:SEEALSO and MOS:FNNR. Second, the material in this section that offers substantive information as opposed to internal links, and therefore needs references. Deccantrap (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply